"What I'm dealing with is so vast and great that it can't be called the truth. It's above the truth." - Sun Ra
Sunday, July 8, 2012
How much more disclosure do you need? Irrefutable Sources Speakin' Out
People outside the loop scoff and sneer and decry lack of evidence but the thing is, just because you don't bother to do the research doesn't mean there's no disclosure. Just because any real 'hard' evidence is confiscated by men in black and shady air force security personnel doesn't somehow remove the truth, unless that's what you pray to believe. You want some wool? The government has some wool for you.
In this Fox Clip Steven Bassett argues with Shep Shepard who says of ET disclosure politics, "and we know this... how?" all dismissively, which is fascinating. Imagine a pundit talking about Putin's politics and Shep going "We know this how?" As if eyewitnesses and mountains of evidence don't really validate it. But that's okay because the truth is out there. Thus the government both discloses and denies at the same time. It's like the scenes in movies where the guy says to the detective "I don't know what you're talking about" but looks off in the direction of the exit as he says so, implying he wants to talk to the detective outside, away from prying ears. But our moronic reporters go "What? How can you not know?"
If you reverse that you have the clip below. Bassett tells Shep UFOs are real--the flat out truth--and Shep can't handle it. It illustrates the difficulty so many people have accepting this fact. It's sheer mind-boggling implications are so monstrous and bizarre we shrink away from it. It's not like we believe the Air Force cover stories about Roswell, but if you tell us it really happened, a saucer from Zeta Riticuli crashed in the desert, then you're a nut. Either a nut or in denial.
(POST SCRIPT - I had a lot of video links up here but youtube or someone has removed them -only this remains:)
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
The Zealots of Doubt, or why skeptics are the new cranks
"Let me add one more important point: The general a priori-scepticism, the systematic, total denial, damages, even destroys the basic value of the human testimony with grave and incalculable consequences, since it is indeed the fundament of human society, if individual, social or religious. Of course there is always one or the other exemption, there are errors and lies, but generally all our life is based on what we learned from others. It is unthinkable to live without this basic confidence, unimaginable are the consequences of a general negation of the human experience on the individual, social and religious life. It would destroy the very fundament of any human society! " -- Monsignore Corrado Balducci, Rome
"..if God exists and he actually made a cloud formation in the sky that literally said “I exist – signed, God“, skeptics would chalk it up to people seeing what they want to see. If God literally materialized in the sky so that everyone could see, I’m pretty sure skeptics would chalk it up to a rare light formation in the atmosphere due to the ionization of cosmic radiation (or some similar nonsense). My point is simply this: Commitment to doubt is not synonymous with commitment to truth. Skeptics however, can rarely tell the difference." --Xenlogic- Atheism Exposed
"There are still some things science is too young to understand" - Ewan McGregor, Angels and Demons
Watching a TV documentary on the infamous 1952 exorcism wherein presumably objects flew around the room, I finally lost it when some smartass skeptic 'psychology major' interviewed for the documentary dismissed these reports noting that "firsthand accounts are notoriously unreliable"! So this skeptic claims he is a more reliable judge of what went on in that 1952 real-life exorcist case than the priests that were there, who recorded the objects flying around in scrupulous notes. He believes he's right purely because textbooks and learned scientific consensus can't measure, understand, validate or admit in things beyond it's self. That's as it should be, to a point. Whether they are right or not is immaterial. They probably are, but that's kind of a bummer, the one who chides the birthday party magician, assuring all the other kids it's 'just a trick.'
Generally that's the kid no one likes. Take note, science! You're a drag.
But of course all the psych major's knowledge on the subject comes from professors and Western Medical Consensus that regularly denies what it does not understand - yet is taken as 'truth.' The trouble with such strains of thought is that a truth can't exist unless it's already learned about. Science can never grasp that which remains out of its reach, since it is sure it's already reached it.
Even though the web is choked on quotes from NASA and astronauts about firsthand alien experience, these skeptics--who haven't even deigned to glance at the mountain of evidence-- have decided a priori the witnesses and experts are all either lying or hallucinating or misinterpreting marsh gas. This is a scary thought: people in charge of protecting our country from invasion can't recognize stars, aircraft or marsh gas when they see them. But that doesn't concern skeptics, who are confident that whatever they were taught about reality at their university is true, and all else hopelessly unimportant or the ravings of the less intelligent and deluded. They claim they'll believe in aliens when they can meet one in person, yet they believe in George Washington based purely on ("notoriously unreliable") firsthand witness reports filtered down through the ages, some sketchy portraits, a diary, all of which could be faked, and the unreliable commonality of history books. Since they don't get a chance to meet Washington, by logical association with their denial UFOs, he may not have actually existed. And clearly Washington, if he existed, was delusional because he saw UFOs and was visited by alien spirits too. How he ever forged a country without the help of smarmy psych majors to set him straight we'll never know.
The thing is, these people who dismiss these things so smarmily are not true skeptics, because skeptics keep an open mind. Like Sherlock Holmes, they believe in nothing and everything until evidence is conclusive and sometimes not even then. In that definition I am more of a skeptic than say the odious Cook (right).
BUT when you deny all evidence to the contrary, even if it's just firsthand accounts, because it doesn't fit your paradigm, then you are not a skeptic: you are exactly what you're seeking to expose -- a crank, a deluded nut. Instead of raving about phantoms and insects inside your skin you're a drowning man clinging life-vestedly to the most safe and mainstream 'norms' of science, but you're still a nut. At that point skepticism no longer means curious or open to new ideas or a willingness to suspend judgment until the facts are in, but instead it is the last refuge of paranoid fledgling 'experts' in fields who have been spending fortunes on post-grad studies and parroting the party line that will award them power and tenure.
Skeptics will accept that they are annoying everyone around them if it means they are the center of attention. Suddenly the UFO Hunters aren't theorizing and getting their minds boggled on some new piece of evidence, instead they're trying to convince Kevin Cook that the evidence is in fact slightly more than what can be explained away by marsh gas or a hubcap tossed in the air. Cook is a great example of the kid no one likes so he learns to passive aggressively seek attention with a kind of continual negative-reinforcement he mistakes as public service (for example - threatening to tell the teacher that the other kids are smoking). Notes UFO MAG:
The founding fathers wrote their papers long before 1952, which was when the whole debunking and ridiculing thing started as part of Operation Bluebook. That's the most absurd part -- the ridicule contingent genuinely thinks they're free of delusion, they're too smart to be taken in by the whole UFO nonsense, but the ridicule and dismissal was generated through a deliberate government program of ridicule that didn't exist until 1952. It's a bit like the war on drugs... for awhile LSD was legal and being tested in hundreds of hospitals and college studies. Groundbreaking insight into all sorts of mental illnesses, new therapies, etc. right and left. Then, suddenly and without due diligence, it was illegal. Anyone who still stuck up for it, or who took it, was a criminal, insane, deluded, requiring hospitalization. Similarly, I've been browbeaten by a lot of women who look at me like I'm their kid they caught shoplifting when I mention UFOs. But it's the skeptics and browbeaters who are the shoplifters, for they never once examine or question virulence of their own position, which is not even their own. Do they wake children up to tell them Santa Clause doesn't exist? Why don't they go to hospitals and lecture cancer patients about the impossibility of a hereafter or a God on their death beds? Why are they scared to entertain the possibility of broadening the parameters of the known? Is it so important for their negativity to be heard? If they truly don't believe in something why mention it. I don't go around yelling at children about the impossibility of unicorns, yet I don't believe they exist. Does this mean I'm a hypocrite? No, I'm just not a dick.
These skeptics never bother to read up and learn the shady origins of their ridicule. Skeptics don't like to feel they've been influenced, or that they're just drones of social conditioning, even as they parrot the status quo like indoctrinated fascists.
The more we understand these things the more it is about vibrations, that there is no truth, only waves, and when we've learned to measure and translate the waves and frequencies that as yet lie outside our senses, then all this will be self-evident. The few times I've been outside my body I've felt these vibrations and understood them as channels on a radio, like being able to travel through a red glowing root system that connects you to everything - your nervous system and its impressions are suddenly catalogued and transcended; your senses are flooded and united by the overpowering signal; your radio suddenly tuning into the far away stations perfectly clear, hearing consciously the music that was always there, in the airwaves, regardless of your tuning in or not.
But since I experience these things on occasion, I'm a freak. If the most unimaginative of people can't feel or experience something, can't measure it, then science not only ignores it, but persecutes, even bullies, those who continue to explore it.
Thus do we grind our human progress to a halt, all so the skeptic can smile his smug smile.
I believe this is largely because of neurochemistry: the left (logical-analytical) brain and right (intuitive-creative) brain are in an ideological war. The right brained people acknowledge the importance of the left, while the left-brained often dismiss the right as a lot of unreliable fantasy. That's why they fail to see the big picture or if they do, it's a soulless void, godless and empty.
Sooner or later you have to surrender all that and step into the unknown, so while the skeptic barks and growls to protect his giant faceless 1%, are you really gonna let him shame you into not following the white rabbit down the hole?
I hate to break it to you, o skeptic puppy dog, your owner has no biscuit to toss you for your betrayal of your own brood. You can either let go of your own leash and open your damn mind, or you can just stay behind and feed your doggy-in-the-window soul to the reptiles until all that's left of you is your Cheshire smirk. Either way, just stay out of my paranormal documentaries or face the wrath of the Ring!!
There's nothing wrong with a skeptic if they're open minded (Ryder calls herself a 'skeliever' and that's kind of where I'm at with it all, too), but smug dorks like Ben will be closing their eyes and counting to ten refusing to believe a flood is coming long after they've officially drowned. And good riddance.
Even though the web is choked on quotes from NASA and astronauts about firsthand alien experience, these skeptics--who haven't even deigned to glance at the mountain of evidence-- have decided a priori the witnesses and experts are all either lying or hallucinating or misinterpreting marsh gas. This is a scary thought: people in charge of protecting our country from invasion can't recognize stars, aircraft or marsh gas when they see them. But that doesn't concern skeptics, who are confident that whatever they were taught about reality at their university is true, and all else hopelessly unimportant or the ravings of the less intelligent and deluded. They claim they'll believe in aliens when they can meet one in person, yet they believe in George Washington based purely on ("notoriously unreliable") firsthand witness reports filtered down through the ages, some sketchy portraits, a diary, all of which could be faked, and the unreliable commonality of history books. Since they don't get a chance to meet Washington, by logical association with their denial UFOs, he may not have actually existed. And clearly Washington, if he existed, was delusional because he saw UFOs and was visited by alien spirits too. How he ever forged a country without the help of smarmy psych majors to set him straight we'll never know.
![]() |
| Kevin Cook, a smirky dillweed |
"Just remember one thing: don't be skeptical halfheartedly. Be a total skeptic. When I say be a total skeptic, I mean that your skeptical ideas should also be put to the same test as anybody else's beliefs. Skepticism, when it is total, burns itself out because you have to question and doubt your skepticism too. You cannot leave your skepticism without doubt; otherwise that is the standpoint of the believer" - OshoNow, there are skeptics who are open-minded, who can grasp the mystery, and who can surrender their doubt long enough to entertain the possibility - who don't let their doubt sink their ship of open-minded wonderment anymore than they let belief uproot their staunch open-minded doubt. Such a skeptic is Gordon Bonnet of Skeptophilia (read his hilarious response to my ideas on Bigfoot here). A true skeptic is not someone who merely clings to their narrow worldview and defends it like a frightened NRA member patrolling the Mexican border. A true skeptic is not swayed either by science or religion. They are not suckers but neither are they fundamentalist defenders of the 'norm'.
BUT when you deny all evidence to the contrary, even if it's just firsthand accounts, because it doesn't fit your paradigm, then you are not a skeptic: you are exactly what you're seeking to expose -- a crank, a deluded nut. Instead of raving about phantoms and insects inside your skin you're a drowning man clinging life-vestedly to the most safe and mainstream 'norms' of science, but you're still a nut. At that point skepticism no longer means curious or open to new ideas or a willingness to suspend judgment until the facts are in, but instead it is the last refuge of paranoid fledgling 'experts' in fields who have been spending fortunes on post-grad studies and parroting the party line that will award them power and tenure.
Skeptics will accept that they are annoying everyone around them if it means they are the center of attention. Suddenly the UFO Hunters aren't theorizing and getting their minds boggled on some new piece of evidence, instead they're trying to convince Kevin Cook that the evidence is in fact slightly more than what can be explained away by marsh gas or a hubcap tossed in the air. Cook is a great example of the kid no one likes so he learns to passive aggressively seek attention with a kind of continual negative-reinforcement he mistakes as public service (for example - threatening to tell the teacher that the other kids are smoking). Notes UFO MAG:
Here's hoping UFO Hunters gets rid of the new skeptoid, or that at least things improve. Maybe Cook will get a clue. I'm certainly not going to give up watching the program. Let's hope Cook gets off his snarky little horse and stops with the smirking, and shows us he's actually done some research about UFOsOn the show Ancient Aliens we learn that the founding fathers of our country were "men of science - their belief in extraterrestrials was part of their conception of the universe," (see it here). This is how it should be regarding reports of UFOs, a given. We need to trust eyewitness accounts the way we trust them in a courtroom. After all, most men and women of science admit there are countless planets out there which could support life, and one or two (or two million) could be more advanced than us, and certainly it's not inconceivable that one day, millions of years from now, we might be able to fold space or travel back in time. At the same time, skeptics contemptuously dismiss anything or anyone that suggests it might already be happening / happened. It can't be true, of course, but it can be true, one day. It's like a kid runs inside screaming about seeing Bigfoot and his dad punishes him for lying. Moments later a newscast comes on and says there's proof Bigfoot was in the area, sighted and confirmed by the police and military, but the dad still doesn't believe his son or lift the punishment. He's worried the kid will think he's wishy-washy.
The founding fathers wrote their papers long before 1952, which was when the whole debunking and ridiculing thing started as part of Operation Bluebook. That's the most absurd part -- the ridicule contingent genuinely thinks they're free of delusion, they're too smart to be taken in by the whole UFO nonsense, but the ridicule and dismissal was generated through a deliberate government program of ridicule that didn't exist until 1952. It's a bit like the war on drugs... for awhile LSD was legal and being tested in hundreds of hospitals and college studies. Groundbreaking insight into all sorts of mental illnesses, new therapies, etc. right and left. Then, suddenly and without due diligence, it was illegal. Anyone who still stuck up for it, or who took it, was a criminal, insane, deluded, requiring hospitalization. Similarly, I've been browbeaten by a lot of women who look at me like I'm their kid they caught shoplifting when I mention UFOs. But it's the skeptics and browbeaters who are the shoplifters, for they never once examine or question virulence of their own position, which is not even their own. Do they wake children up to tell them Santa Clause doesn't exist? Why don't they go to hospitals and lecture cancer patients about the impossibility of a hereafter or a God on their death beds? Why are they scared to entertain the possibility of broadening the parameters of the known? Is it so important for their negativity to be heard? If they truly don't believe in something why mention it. I don't go around yelling at children about the impossibility of unicorns, yet I don't believe they exist. Does this mean I'm a hypocrite? No, I'm just not a dick.
These skeptics never bother to read up and learn the shady origins of their ridicule. Skeptics don't like to feel they've been influenced, or that they're just drones of social conditioning, even as they parrot the status quo like indoctrinated fascists.
"Radio has no future. Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. X-rays will prove to be a hoax."--William Thomson, Lord Kelvin English scientist, 1899.
"Meanwhile there is the forbidden technology, of Tesla and Reich, the forbidden sciences of Crowley and Jack Parsons, the idea of quantum entanglement, the final arrival of physics into the realm of being able to rationalize and explain telepathy, the power of prayer and its possible influence on otherworldly communication. The irrefutable proof of telepathy; the conclusive Princeton prayer studies. Are the scientists saying ants and birds are more evolved than us? Science admits it's barely begun to explore the 'other' 90% of the brain, all while ridiculing any conjecture about what the unknown 90% may consist of. Telepathy is ridiculous (why? They can't be bothered to ask their superiors for fear of being branded a kook); science admits they've discovered less than 20% of all the creatures that exist in the ocean, but sea serpents are ridiculous.
"At this point in the game, dogmatic denial and professional debunking constitute the irrational... Why do we, as a highly educated and supposedly free society, allow these fake rationalisms and this constant censorship campaign to continue unchallenged?" - Whitley StreiberThe thing is, those of us who are open to mysteries include all sorts of high level pols and deep thinkers, but the few skinny little shitheads who know nothing about the topic just get to mouth the popular reactionary opinion like an invisible throng of supporters is continually applauding them. They get on TV because, in the end, the TV suits want this weird shit couched in doubt... only Ancient Aliens rises above, realizing that dismissive 'experts' just sound as outgunned as celibacy-advocating virgins at a Haight Ashbury acid test.
The more we understand these things the more it is about vibrations, that there is no truth, only waves, and when we've learned to measure and translate the waves and frequencies that as yet lie outside our senses, then all this will be self-evident. The few times I've been outside my body I've felt these vibrations and understood them as channels on a radio, like being able to travel through a red glowing root system that connects you to everything - your nervous system and its impressions are suddenly catalogued and transcended; your senses are flooded and united by the overpowering signal; your radio suddenly tuning into the far away stations perfectly clear, hearing consciously the music that was always there, in the airwaves, regardless of your tuning in or not.
But since I experience these things on occasion, I'm a freak. If the most unimaginative of people can't feel or experience something, can't measure it, then science not only ignores it, but persecutes, even bullies, those who continue to explore it.
Thus do we grind our human progress to a halt, all so the skeptic can smile his smug smile.
I believe this is largely because of neurochemistry: the left (logical-analytical) brain and right (intuitive-creative) brain are in an ideological war. The right brained people acknowledge the importance of the left, while the left-brained often dismiss the right as a lot of unreliable fantasy. That's why they fail to see the big picture or if they do, it's a soulless void, godless and empty.
Sooner or later you have to surrender all that and step into the unknown, so while the skeptic barks and growls to protect his giant faceless 1%, are you really gonna let him shame you into not following the white rabbit down the hole?
I hate to break it to you, o skeptic puppy dog, your owner has no biscuit to toss you for your betrayal of your own brood. You can either let go of your own leash and open your damn mind, or you can just stay behind and feed your doggy-in-the-window soul to the reptiles until all that's left of you is your Cheshire smirk. Either way, just stay out of my paranormal documentaries or face the wrath of the Ring!!
![]() |
| Can you guess which one is the smirky dillweed? |
ADDENDUM:
There's a new show on NatGeo, CHASING UFOS that has a skeptic even more annoying than Kevin Cook! He's Ben Something, and he's super smug in his dismissal of all evidence as explainable by natural rationalizations. As awesome as Erin Ryder is (above, center), I couldn't even get five minutes in due to this disrespectful, skeevy skeptic. Who in the hell gave him a camera or a right, and why does NatGeo insist on poisoning the well with these tiresome types? If you had a show about molecular physics would you insist on adding a bible belt hysteric who kept proclaiming no molecules exist, only the lord? In truth, those poor dumb Christians are ten times righter than old Ben with his hysterical blindness to anything he didn't learn in grad school. Bullying witnesses as if it's their moral duty to convince him of their sightning's validity, he's an insulting and hostile pisher who should be barred from all television.There's nothing wrong with a skeptic if they're open minded (Ryder calls herself a 'skeliever' and that's kind of where I'm at with it all, too), but smug dorks like Ben will be closing their eyes and counting to ten refusing to believe a flood is coming long after they've officially drowned. And good riddance.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Prometheus and the Moon Maiden
There's a very eerie couple of videos that have never been fully explained away as hoaxes concerning 'Apollo 20' - an expedition to the moon undertaken in secret by Russian and American astro/cosmonauts, kept super secret because of the wild ass shit they found. In anticipation of the big PROMETHEUS premiere it's worth unearthing it, because the similarities to the story are, well, eerie.
One of the coolest parts of the original ALIEN (1979) is the whole first half which involves the Nostromo crew's investigation of a stormy harsh planet on which is a (crash?) landed ship, gigantic in size, shaped like a giant pair of fallopian tubes, at the helm of which is a strange calcified giant who looks like he's either half-elephant or a pilot from a distant future where he's literally a part of the craft, his spine externally locked into the seat, his nose a hideous extension of a flight mask breathing apparatus. There's a hole in the being's chest, burst outwards and then froze in time, which the crew have no idea about. It's one of the highlights of the entire film! Nothing about this thing is explained because once John Hurt picks up his face hugger there's no time to analyze what this ancient creature could have been. All we know is, the creature's ship is hugely fallopian/vaginal the way most of earth's crafts are phallic. This detail has helped countless masters in media studies students write tight theses on ALIEN and the Freudian feminist body horror whatever, but the question of just who the 'space jockey' is has never been answered. Until now...or should I say since 2007! It's a stand-in for... the Moon Mona Lisa!
During a top secret Apollo 20 mission, astronauts from both the US and USSR investigated what looked from space like an ancient, huge space craft spotted on the moon. It was/is covered with bizarre markings and has been on the moon for what could well be millions of years. Inside they found a woman of vaguely Eskimo (Mayan?) mummy descent, her eyes, mouth and ears connected to the still active space craft, both in a state of advanced hibernation. Like the space jockey in ALIEN she was attached to the ship for both life support and some kind of advanced virtual reality reality interconnected piloting:
To get your bearings on the tale, start with this interview with covert cosmonaut William Rutledge.
"....They appeared to be frozen and the female was moved into what appeared to be the control area of the Lunar Module. The bodies appeared to be well preserved and showed very little signs of decay. There was also detail to the possibility that the aliens had been subjected to ripped flesh because of skin splitting in the cold and the areas around the lips started to decay first, similar to what happens when humans decay in the grave. Rutledge the man who was on the mission claimed that he believed the female was in some sort of hibernation state...
Rutledge claims that he and cosmonaut Lexei Leonov landed a Russian made LEM (LUNAR MODULE) near the giant alien ship and entered inside . They found ancient artifacts and two bodies that they claimed were the “pilots” — one of the bodies was fully intact and in excellent condition. She was a female and video revealed that she had breasts and that her body had been well preserved. A male body was also found but it was not intact, it had deteriorated and all could be saved was the head.
They Named the woman alien Mona Lisa. She had six fingers and toes.
“We went inside the big spaceship, also into a triangular one. The major parts of the exploration was; it was a mother ship, very old, who crossed the universe at least milliard of years ago (1.5 estimated). There were many signs of biology inside, old remains of a vegetation in a “motor” section, special triangular rocks who emitted “tears” of a yellow liquid which has some special medical properties, and of course signs of extra solar creatures. We found remains of little bodies (10cm) living in a network of glass tubes all along the ship, but the major discovery was two bodies, one intact.
The “City” was named on Earth and scheduled as station one, but it appeared to be a real space garbage, full of scrap, gold parts, only one construction seemed intact (we named it the Cathedral). We made shots of pieces of metal, of every part wearing calligraphy, exposed to the sun. The “City” seem to be as old as the ship, but it is a very tiny part. On the rover video, the telephoto lens make the artifacts greater.
I don’t remember who named the girl, Leonov or me — was the intact EBE. Humanoid, female, 1.65 meter. Genitalized, haired, six fingers (we guess that mathematics are based on a dozen). Function; pilot, piloting device fixed to fingers and eyes, no clothes, we had to cut two cables connected to the nose. No nostril. Leonov unfixed the eyes device (you’ll see that in the video). Concentrations of blood or bio liquid erupted and froze from the mouth, nose, eyes and some parts of the body. Some parts of the body were in unusual good condition, (hair) and the skin was protected by a thin transparent protection layer.
As we told to mission control, condition seemed not dead not alive. We had no medical background or experience, but Leonov and I used a test, we fixed our bio equipment on the EBE, and telemetry received by surgeon (Mission Control meds) was positive. That’s another story. Some parts could be unbelievable now, I prefer tell the whole story when other videos will be online. This experience has been filmed in the LM. We found a second body, destroyed; we brought the head on board. Color of the skin was blue gray, a pastel blue. Skin had some strange details above the eyes and the front, a strap around the head, wearing no inscription. The “cockpit” was full of calligraphy and formed of long semi hexagonal tubes. She is on Earth and she is not dead, but I prefer to post other videos before telling what happened after.
This Apollo 20 was supposed to have gone up in 1976 or '78 -- plenty of time for Ridley Scott, H.R. Giger and screenwriter Dan O'Bannon to have heard about it, or 'sensed' it through the subconscious-creative-intuitive channels. They may have 'come up with it' on their own but we're all interconnected so there's really no such thing as 'on our own.' It all came from somewhere.
And 'come up' is the perfect phrase for it, signifying a descent to the depths of a cosmic pool and a return to the surface, with a little souvenir. After all, it's 'encoded' in our DNA so it's just waiting to be accessed - the future, the past, outer space, our origin story. Our collective being is like a giant video game disk (and we do look round and orb-like when outside our bodies) and we've barely reached the end of level one. Just because we can't unlock the other levels... yet... doesn't mean they aren't still there 'encoded' in the disk. Yet mainstream science scoffs at this idea, claiming that the disk itself is just shiny nothingness. Have you ever, when a kid, looked at the grooves of an LP and pretended you could 'read' the music? But every once in awhile... a moon Mona Lisa comes along with a phonograph needle in each eye.
And of course Hollywood and Top Secret information go way back. There's a chance the makers of Alien could have heard all about this expedition, and just cloaked it in some goofy trappings. Allegations of this kind of thing are all over the web: Spielberg was 'told' some things by Reagan; Kubrick faked the moon landings in exchange for unlimited funding and insider knowledge on certain 'secrets' (Kubrick was even killed because Eyes Wide Shut seemed too close to home), and all this after a lot of the connections between military scientists and TV shows like the Outer Limits as explained by Bruce Rux in Hollywood vs. the Aliens. And lots not forget the crazy German author whose work started a secret society the Vrills!
Here's what a Hyrbid post regarding an alien looking ridge found on Saturn's moon Iapetus says on the matter:
Did Arthur C. Clarke have access to secret knowledge? It is speculated that some of hollywood's best writers, including George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have been privy to accessing secretive occult knowledge. In other words: not all of their ideas are original. It is interesting that Arthur C. Clarke wrote about an alien monolith on Saturn's Moon Iapetus, at a time in the 1960's when NASA knew very little about this moon. Then, in 2004 it is discovered an incredible mountain ridge encompasses nearly the entire planet - in what is likely the most bizarre formation in the solar system. What is inside the equilateral ridge? Does an alien monolith await us?
Scott and O'Bannon were also inspired for the story by sci fi films of the late 1950s-60s, and they're all on Netflix streaming, so check out this triple feature of ALIEN inspirations I've assembled over on Bright Lights After Dark!
------
LASTLY:
Check out here the strange resemblance of this mummified Inca Maiden to the Moona Lisa. Was an Inca, Aztec, or Mayan maiden recruited to power/drive the alien ship - or suspend it in animation? The lack of flesh eating germs high up in the icy Andes and way out on the dark side of the moon would certainly indicate some weird connection if you were all paranoid, like some authors of this blog... you can see under the mummy wig stitching slightly in the "Apollo" footage, by the way, which is a comfort. Even on the moon, everyone looks good in a Sheinhardt.
Labels:
Apollo 20,
Arthur C. Clarke,
Bruce Rux,
Dan O'Bannon,
Iapetus,
Inca Mummy,
Leonov,
Mayan,
Prometheus,
Ridley Scott,
Saturn,
William Rutledge
Sunday, April 22, 2012
Baron Munchausen Vas Dere!
Munchausen: We ran out of gas and oil, but I stayed high in ze air for six more months.This bit of cornball humor sums up the Divinorum Psychonauticus credo perfectly. When one forgets to be bound by what science considers possible one can can truly achieve anything. When one leaves the delusion of objectivity behind, when one surrenders to the impossibility of all but the subjective position, then one sees beyond science's roped off notions of infinity... the only catch is that what you think and write becomes fiction, tall tales, and therefore invalid as far as science is concerned.
Announcer: Without fuel? That's against the law of gravity!
Munchausen: Well, zat was before dat law was passed.
Of course science must be lauded for working towards an objective reality that makes certain strides toward genuine progress inevitable... and those strides are needed, what's not needed is their smug disregard for the ravings of lunatics, for the insanity and magic of today is the scientific 'law' of tomorrow, but science is awfully dismissive of any information that didn't require the murder of at least 100 rabbits or chimps in lab conditions.
The sin of Adam and Eve, to this Munchausen way of theorizing, is't discovering objective knowledge but subjective freedom. The apple, the fruit of knowledge, is a peyote button and that's where God lives. The sin is in abandoning the garden for concrete structures; the sin is in creating electricity, monsters, and air conditioning, exhaust fumes and bio-engineered pain factories. But it's a stopgap sin of which God inevitably, begrudgingly approves. Civilization's gruesome steps are necessary for His dreamers to make the jump from dreams to physical space travel. Meanwhile, the shamen and space cadet musicians are hard at work making the box of tunes he can bring with him and blast all the way to Mars.
Of course he could just listen to the radio and stay home. The waves of the universe are crowded with radio stations SETI will never find, but are picked up daily by psychics, telepaths, and remote viewers, by schizophrenics and trippers, by shamen and the dying and the newly born, and by those in haunted houses, and near power lines... for civilization's incessant din and its narrow AM/FM bands is truly is the whistling in the dark, the white noise machine so reason can sleep in the madness-besieged zombie movie mall universe. In order to effect our own destiny we need to be able to hear ourselves think, and thus the invention of rock and roll and power amps, and death metal, and car crashes, bridges, skyscrapers and plutonium.
But ultimately these iron tools never bridge the fourth dimensional veil - only bone and soft tissue gets through, nothing metal, ala Terminator movies, but even then there are beings who have figured out how to transgress that, though none of them are yet from earth (outside of occasional black budget funding breakthroughs). The beings who can move in and out of time and space have long ago abandoned non-biologicl technology. As UFO wreckage recovery teams often nervously note, the material of the saucers seems alive, and indestructible, far beyond the concepts of animate and inanimate that we still cling to. That's the TRUE sin of Adam and Eve, for those aliens are us in the future, which is the same as the past once you master time travel, and that's why we can never capture bigfoot. He too is outside of our linear time and perception. In the radio analogy he would be like where you're listening to a radio station rock channel and suddenly some weird voice breaks in through a wall of static as you pass by a power line or something and you hear a mad preacher or a car salesman and then it's back to the song, as if nothing in the song's wholeness had ever been broken.
We can't find Bigfoot the way you can't find that voice again on the radio; it just blinks in and is gone. Like a wave particle in a Schrodinger Cathouse, it was almost never not there. Like Stephen Malkmus of Pavement, the bigfoot knows that between here and there is better than either here or there.
This is perhaps old Munchausen's secret. His stories take place before cumbersome laws like gravity and thermo-dynamics were 'passed.' In deliberately skewing his stories to a level where they can't possibly be believed he undoes the damage caused by science and its draconian dogma, freeing us from the prison of textbooks. While science fumbles in the dark for its car keys, all the while proclaiming there's plenty of light, Munchausen has already floated away on the currents of his own balderdash, blazing megawatt clouds of gaseous fury as he goes.
Friday, April 6, 2012
The Tibetan-Nordic-Fashion-Huldra-LSD Aliens Connection (Uma Thurman is from Venus - Part 2)
First, examine this D.A. Pennebaker short film chronicling the wedding of Leary and Schlebrügge, "You're Nobody til Somebody Loves You" that includes some "lonely piano" music by jazz great Charles Mingus (which in itself confirms my feeling listening to "Black Saint and the Sinner Lady," that Mingus is Duke Ellington on an acid trip muppet melt-down). Writes Pennebaker:
"This movie is something of a mystery. Timothy Leary was getting married to a model named Nena Von Schlebrugge up in Millbrook, New York at the Hitchcock house, where Leary had been carrying on his hallucinogenic revelries for the past year or so after leaving Harvard. It was rumored that this was going to be the wedding of the season, the wedding of Mr. And Mrs. Swing as Cab Calloway put it. " - D.A. Pennebaker (PH Films)Now you might think offhand that Timothy Leary (who Nena married in 1964) and Thurman (who Nena married in 1967) have nothing in common, but they actually do -- they have one thing especially in common, The Tibetan Book of the Dead!
From Leary's "The Psychedelic Experience" - avail. online at Erowid:
The Tibetan Book of the Dead is ostensibly a book describing the experiences to be expected at the moment of death, during an intermediate phase lasting forty-nine (seven times seven) days, and during rebirth into another bodily frame. This however is merely the exoteric framework which the Tibetan Buddhists used to cloak their mystical teachings. The language and symbolism of death rituals of Bonism, the traditional pre-Buddhist Tibetan religion, were skillfully blended with Buddhist conceptions. The esoteric meaning, as it has been interpreted in this manual, is that it is death of the ego and rebirth that is described, not of the body. Lama Govinda indicates this clearly in his introduction when he writes: "It is a book for the living as well as the dying." The book's esoteric meaning is often concealed beneath many layers of symbolism. It was not intended for general reading. It was designed to be understood only by one who was to be initiated personally by a guru into the Buddhist mystical doctrines, into the pre-mortem-death- rebirth experience. These doctrines have been kept a closely guarded secret for many centuries, for fear that naive or careless application would do harm. In translating such an esoteric text, therefore, there are two steps: one, the rendering of the original text into English; and two, the practical interpretation of the text for its uses. In publishing this practical interpretation for use in the psychedelic drug session, we are in a sense breaking with the tradition of secrecy and thus contravening the teachings of the lama-gurus.
Leary's adaptation of the TBOTD stresses ego death rather than real death, and makes the esoteric accessible (though the Buddhist scholars may have been right to worry about careless application, i.e. Altamont, Manson, etc).
Meanwhile, Uma's father, Robert Thurman, has his own Book of the Dead translation, more from an academic angle. And here's where it gets really weird: Leary was introduced to Von Schlebrugge by Salvador Dali; Thurman is a personal friend of the Dali Lama. Get the 'Dali' connection?
Here's what Robert has to say about his relation to Buddhism:
Now we go to Nena's own mom, Uma's maternal grandmother, who posed for the below statue:
It's cool, but for our purposes the below left one is much more interesting:
(L) SkogsrÃ¥ - Axel Ebbe, 1913 / 1930. Axel Ebbes konsthall, Trelleborg, Sweden."The girl to the right is Uma Thurman’s grandmother Birgit Holmquist, married Von Schleebrügge. The sculpture was originally made in 1913, but the artist changed the girl’s face in 1930 and used Uma Thurman’s grandmother Birgit as his model. Birgit later married a German baron in Berlin, but left Germany for Mexico during the war. Uma’s mother Nena Schlebrügge was born in Mexico City, and became a model like her mother, not for art but for fashion. Birgit returned to Germany in later years; she wanted to be buried in her hometown Trelleborg, so that’s where she rests now.Surely we can link the creature represented by this statue to both common reports of alien abductions (just using the parlance of their time, long before the events of 1947), and the TBOTD since the description of the huldra matches descriptions of certain kinds of ghost-demons along the way to reincarnation (through the Sidpa Bardo) that come on like beautiful, inviting women writhing in sexual invitation, and when you get close enough to their sexual heat, they ensnare you and become ancient crones, then devouring fiends, rending your soul and/or ensnaring you into the matrix for prompt reincarnation.
"A “skogsrÃ¥” (“rÃ¥” is pronounced “raw” and means watcher, “skogs” means “connected to/from to the forest”. Watcher of the forest, in other words) is both a beautiful wood nymph and an ugly hag at the same time. She lures people into the forest with her beautiful looks, and when they are too deep in to find their way back, she turns her back at them and then she looks just like a tree trunk. The charmed one is lost, deep in the forest. The skogsrÃ¥ or huldra is mainly a trickster, not so much a demon. She can have sex with humans if she wants to, and if she does, they become silent and withdrawn afterwards, because then she has their soul. The skogsrÃ¥ is also the ruler of all the animals in the forest. "(Source: The curator of the museum Axel Ebbes konsthall and genealogists Bo Lindwall & Gert PÃ¥hlsson.)
On the psychedelic plane, seeing writhing sexual figures in flames or in the passing shadows on the wall is common, and perhaps represents a less immersive version of this lesson, this parable for age and death, the way the invitation to life is always in the process of corrupting itself. Von Schlebrügge is perhaps the princess of this process, at least in a symbolic capacity, and one can perhaps divulge from this that she is an immortal with a soul stretching back to her aeons as Isis herself.
![]() |
| Nena Von Schlebrugge (Uma's mom) |
In the 1930s, German anthropologists were searching all over the Himalayas and India, looking for relics and magical boxes and links of Aryan - Tibetan - Indian ancestry (as evidenced in their corruption of the Buddhist image of the swastika, lower left):
But I go into more detail on this aspect of the story over in the Acidemic Journal of Film and Media #7: The Nordics issue (check out the expanded Uma Thurman is from Venus story here) I only want to touch on it for the sake of common-thread weaving. We can't ignore facets of the story just because of the evil that resulted. There is still much conspiratorial dot connecting to be done on the relationship of the Vinyanas in the Mahabarrata to the Hannebu UFO aircraft made in Germany under the guidance of mystic Maria Osric. The link above will delve more into it, but even more shall be revealed still...(Uma) Thurman's maternal grandfather was Colonel Baron Friedrich Karl Johannes von Schlebrügge, a German military officer who had become one of the senior Nazi spies in the Americas but who was also jailed by the Nazis for protecting Jewish friends -Wiki:
One can't connect it all without the weird, hard-to-believe encounters with friendly Nordics by George Adamski and Billy Meier. True or hoax, we learn from them and other sources that the Nordics are very tall, as are Uma and Nena.
And here's a fascinating video on Nordics and The Pleiadians youtube made by gorgeous mystic Gigi Young, who looks not a little bit like Nena Von Schlebrugge! Coincidence? She seems to know more than a little about the Nordics and, like Nena, she went from fashion into eastern spiritual realms. Her genetic resemblance to the goddesses above is surely no coincidence
Well, by now the interconnectedness of these links has left me slightly exhausted. I'd like to close by saying I mean no disrespect to anyone I've mentioned. I'm a big fan of Robert Thurman's work in making Tibetan Buddhism both understandable and academically valid in the west. And I adore Uma, and can tell from her photos and choices in husbands that her mom Nena is a hell of a beautiful, deep, deep lady. So... take all I've said with a grain of sand... but know that that grain contains the universe in its entirety in microcosm... Let yourself ponder the weird ways in which the higher levels of consciousness breed beauty with wisdom to the benefit of us all, and realize too, to be beautiful and prosperous is the first step is to become altruistic instead of egocentric. Let go of your morbid self interest, your confusion of plain and 'normal' as good, and as John Lennon said "relax and float downstream... it is not dying." Hell no, JL, it is beginning...
even if all that's beginning is the ending.
Labels:
Adamski,
Aliens,
Buddhism,
damen,
LSD,
Maria,
models,
Nena Von Schlebrügge,
Nordics,
Robert Thurman,
Sigrun,
Timothy Leary,
Traute,
Uma Thurman,
Vrill
Friday, March 23, 2012
the Bigfoot-Ancient Alien connection- solved!
Watching tonight's episode of Ancient Aliens as a bunch of cryptozoologists theorize what's up with Sasquatch and why can't we catch 'em, I'm quickly signing on to add some aspects they forgot:
1. Our DNA is tampered down, which is to say a lot of our 'junk DNA' is disconnected. We're like parrots with clipped wings, while Bigfoot's are unclipped. If we could access all 100% of our brain, 'turn on' the dormant DNA, we could do some of the things Bigfoot does, such us 'skipping' through time, being able to wink in and out of existence (and thus avoid capture). In fact this is why they are so evasive... they're on the run if you will, from the castrating scissors of the greys. Another metaphor would be when the IT guy comes to upgrade your laptop at work and in the process 'upgrades' you to not be able to access the internet anymore --the bosses thought access was reducing output. The Bigfoot is technically and older more primitive model but can still access the internet, so when the IT guys knock on his door he just vanishes into the bathroom with his laptop until they've moved on. Eventually his software is so incompatible with the the company's continually upgraded mainframe that he's not even registered as an employee. He's seen only once in awhile--late at night--by a scared cleaning lady who walks in on him in the bathroom.
2. The story of the great flood and all that - the Annunaki wanted to wipe out the last race of ape-grey gene splice gold mining slaves (the big Nephilim/bigfoot/Goliath/titans) and start again because they made us in their image and likeness and with many of their powers, their ability to tap into the higher dimensions of consciousness (there are nine total), to vibrate their Kundalini energy in and out of existence and forward and backwards through time, and into alternate dimensions. So when this earlier gigantic race learned how to 'wink out' they no longer wanted to mine gold for their masters. They had the power to hide, and went on the run. The next wave of hybrids had these aspects of the brain shut off, the wings clipped, and were smaller--less uppity, more easily impressed by light shows.
But the cleansing flood couldn't reach the high up mountains, which is why the bigfoot and yeti are often found up there.
3. The reason Bigfoots are sometimes witnessed getting into and out of UFOs is explainable as either a kind of bigfoot terminator or traitor, working to infiltrate the bigfoot colonies, or various 'friendly' alien visitors--the equivalent of, say, Kevin Costner in Dances with Wolves. The bigfoots on UFOs would be like the old Apache trackers signed on with the US Cavalry to help them hunt other tribes. Some Native Americans were eager to leave their tribal way of life, become Christians- - that's something our apologist liberal literature forgets, preferring to go the other way in focus (the Costner)
Riding with the wolf metaphor then, this taps into what I talk about on this site re the common snide dismissal of contemporary lack of evidence alien visitation, etc. "Why don't they land on the White House lawn?" It's like saying if we want to research wolf packs in Alaska why don't we go into their den and challenge the alpha male to a snarling contest then wag our tail and let them sniff our crotch? Instead we do what the aliens do, zap them with a tranq dart, haul them into our mobile lab, tag them with a tracking chip so we can study migration habits, draw a blood sample, measure them head to tail, weigh them, look at their teeth, take some photos and DNA samples, and release them back into the wild with no explanation or apology to their pack. But there are also humans who hunt them from helicopters, so forgive them if they think we're all evil and to be avoided, hidden from, which is not hard as they can smell us coming from miles away.
How do I know all this? I asked my 'channeled' guru panther animal spirit guide! Believe it or not, that's what he 'told' me, in the weird non-linguistic way that spirit guides will where you ask your question while in a trance and "remember" being told the answer as a child or a dream or all along time's spectrum. Now, he's quite a trickster as I've learned on more than one occasion. But this all makes a lot more sense than some of the daffy theories they had on tonight's episode, so I'm posting it here. Make of it what you will, and remember, the truth is so strange no language can encompass it, so never be afraid to leave language at the door when entering the higher planes!
Monday, March 19, 2012
Reptilian Apocalypse Art: A Curation
![]() | |||||||
| Diana of Ephesus and the Slaves (1893–98). - G.A. Sartorio |
![]() |
| Luca Signorelli's The Damned Cast Into Hell, c. 1500 AD |
![]() | ||
| c. Justin Maller |
Reptilian clutching man, from "Vigeland's Strange Art in Oslo"
![]() | |
| Erich Kuersten - Collage "Enki Makes the Man" |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
































